Glemad
    Glemad EditorialStories2 min read

    Mobile Network Operator Protects Its Mobile Money Service Paths With Ollandi

    A mobile network operator uses Ollandi to trace failed mobile money transfers to their source and to detect SIM-swap-led account takeover before it reaches customer wallets.

    Mobile Network Operator Protects Its Mobile Money Service Paths With Ollandi
    2 min read


    Summary

    A mobile network operator deployed Ollandi across its core network, gateways, wallet platform and partner bank links. Failed transfers are now traced to the responsible layer while they occur, and SIM-swap-led account takeover attempts are detected as a single sequence in time to protect the wallet.

    Before Ollandi

    • Each layer of the mobile money service, from radio and core to USSD gateway, wallet platform and partner banks, was owned by a different team or vendor.
    • When transfers failed, each team saw only its own layer.
    • SIM swaps, device changes and wallet PIN resets were recorded in separate systems.
    • Partner bank and vendor link failures surfaced as customer complaints.

    After Ollandi

    • The mobile money service is modelled as one dependency chain; failures are located to the responsible layer.
    • A SIM swap, new device registration and PIN reset on the same subscriber are correlated into one threat sequence.
    • The fraud team is notified so transfers on the affected wallet can be held during review.
    • Partner bank and vendor connections are monitored for availability and changes in use.
    • Containment actions, such as suspending a session or pausing a compromised integration credential, are executed after operator approval.

    Deployment

    • Product: Ollandi, deployed as a reasoning layer over existing network, wallet and identity tooling.
    • Operating control: Assisted Response.
    • Network and wallet configuration changes remain under the operator's authority.

    By the numbers

    Measured across Glemad's production deployments and published in the the earlier model research research paper:

    • Mean time to respond: 2.1 minutes, against an industry average of 420 minutes.
    • Threat coverage: 40 to 60% more multi-step attack chains identified than siloed detection tools.

    These figures come from environments with mature telemetry and defined policy baselines. Results depend on the quality of the telemetry available.